| IronMass Forums Compound vs Isolation Training Discuss Compound vs Isolation in the Bodybuilding Science forums; Which do you say is better? 1 muscle a day isolated and beated to a point where its sore as **** for a week or 2 muscles a day, doing like ... |
| | #1 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 0 | Which do you say is better? 1 muscle a day isolated and beated to a point where its sore as **** for a week or 2 muscles a day, doing like 3 sets per muscle mostly compounded I think isolation is better becausee 1) You hit your muscle once a week, despite whatever. 2) Each muscle gets more individual attention, and ofcourse all of them are trained. |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| The Old Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,226
Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 203 | Quote:
You have much to learn grasshopper.
__________________ Don't forget to periodize ![]() Best BP 507 lbs *competitive* Best Squat 705 lbs *competitive* Best DL 650 lbs *competitive* ![]() Guns don't kill people, men who come home early do. ![]() My workout log http://www.ironmass.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6247 | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
He has some book for 2002 that says you should train no more then 3 times a week, doing only compounds for 3 sets per body part, 3 bp's a day. I said no, thats stupid, and I perfer 1 muscle a day, unless its 2 minors. We got into an arguement, he scans me his gay book, where the guy makes up facts saying over 3 days a week = no growth. It pisses me off.. theres so much bs in there.. I think 1 muscle a day is better then 2, cuz in the end of the week, all your muscles get trained, but Isolation = more intensity on each muscle. Like if you train chest, then shoulders, your triceps arent gonna get a good workout, but in his book, chest press should already work them up.. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| New Member Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 0 | Isolation works for shit. The body is a unit, it is best stressed as a unit, and it adapts as a unit. If isolation worked very well all the curl boys would have huge arms yet it is the guys squatting and pulling doing a few sets for arms a week that have guns. It is no accident that all the best exercises for hypertrophy involve moving heavy loads through fundemental ranges of motion (i.e. vertical full body pushing = squat, vertical full body pulling = deadlift, horizontal torso pushing = press, horizontal torso pulling = row). Don't think about working a muscle think about training the body. I can work the shit out of my quads on leg extension yet the beast doing full squats in the rack is going to build a much bigger body and set of quads. As for frequency - it's really about workload where frequency distributes it. There is a lot of evidence that 1 session per week is suboptimal and that 2 should be the bare minimum. From a strength perspective (and neural efficiency supports hypertrophy gains - think about the newbie gain mechanism) frequency is crucial. That said for most intents and purposes anything over 2-3x starts running into diminishing returns (although you can still get growth going even 5-7 times a week if you program correctly so your friend isn't grasping this well as there are no absolutes). |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 |
| XHTML Validated | Advertisers | Terms of Use |