IronMass Forums
Arcade | Articles | Bodybuilding Videos
About Us Register Members List BodyBuilding Directory Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2006, 06:16 AM   #1
Banned
 
PROD1GY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Recipes: 0
Rep Power: 0 PROD1GY is on a distinguished road
Default Compound vs Isolation


Which do you say is better?
1 muscle a day isolated and beated to a point where its sore as **** for a week
or 2 muscles a day, doing like 3 sets per muscle mostly compounded
I think isolation is better becausee
1) You hit your muscle once a week, despite whatever.
2) Each muscle gets more individual attention, and ofcourse all of them are trained.

PROD1GY is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 12:38 PM   #2
The Old Moderator
 
powerman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,226
Recipes: 0
Rep Power: 203 powerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond reputepowerman2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PROD1GY
Which do you say is better?
1 muscle a day isolated and beated to a point where its sore as **** for a week
or 2 muscles a day, doing like 3 sets per muscle mostly compounded
I think isolation is better becausee
1) You hit your muscle once a week, despite whatever.
2) Each muscle gets more individual attention, and ofcourse all of them are trained.
A compound exercise for large muscle groups is always a better way to cause hypertrophy. Also, doing only 3 sets per muscle ain't gonna get the job done if you want to get big either.

You have much to learn grasshopper.
__________________
Don't forget to periodize
Best BP 507 lbs *competitive*
Best Squat 705 lbs *competitive*
Best DL 650 lbs *competitive*


Guns don't kill people, men who come home early do.

My workout log http://www.ironmass.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6247
powerman2000 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 05:57 PM   #3
Banned
 
PROD1GY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 386
Recipes: 0
Rep Power: 0 PROD1GY is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powerman2000
A compound exercise for large muscle groups is always a better way to cause hypertrophy. Also, doing only 3 sets per muscle ain't gonna get the job done if you want to get big either.

You have much to learn grasshopper.
No, here was the argument.
He has some book for 2002 that says you should train no more then 3 times a week, doing only compounds for 3 sets per body part, 3 bp's a day.
I said no, thats stupid, and I perfer 1 muscle a day, unless its 2 minors.
We got into an arguement, he scans me his gay book, where the guy makes up facts saying over 3 days a week = no growth.
It pisses me off.. theres so much bs in there..
I think 1 muscle a day is better then 2, cuz in the end of the week, all your muscles get trained, but Isolation = more intensity on each muscle.
Like if you train chest, then shoulders, your triceps arent gonna get a good workout, but in his book, chest press should already work them up..
PROD1GY is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 07:27 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7
Recipes: 0
Rep Power: 0 madcow2 is on a distinguished road
Default

Isolation works for shit. The body is a unit, it is best stressed as a unit, and it adapts as a unit. If isolation worked very well all the curl boys would have huge arms yet it is the guys squatting and pulling doing a few sets for arms a week that have guns. It is no accident that all the best exercises for hypertrophy involve moving heavy loads through fundemental ranges of motion (i.e. vertical full body pushing = squat, vertical full body pulling = deadlift, horizontal torso pushing = press, horizontal torso pulling = row).

Don't think about working a muscle think about training the body. I can work the shit out of my quads on leg extension yet the beast doing full squats in the rack is going to build a much bigger body and set of quads.

As for frequency - it's really about workload where frequency distributes it. There is a lot of evidence that 1 session per week is suboptimal and that 2 should be the bare minimum. From a strength perspective (and neural efficiency supports hypertrophy gains - think about the newbie gain mechanism) frequency is crucial. That said for most intents and purposes anything over 2-3x starts running into diminishing returns (although you can still get growth going even 5-7 times a week if you program correctly so your friend isn't grasping this well as there are no absolutes).
madcow2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

XHTML Validated | Advertisers | Terms of Use

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70