How many of you know about this yet?

**NNTB** · 07-25-2007, 01:52 AM

.... do you care? You should...

North American Union to Replace the USA? - HUMAN EVENTS

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

----------------------------

The AMERO

American currency union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AmeroCurrency.com portal page Welcome to a discussion of the Amero, the possible new North American currency, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the formation of a North American Union between the U.S., Canada and MexicoHome

The Amero vs. The Dollar
------------------------

Cliff notes: President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

New Currency could be on the way... the amero.

**NNTB** · 07-25-2007, 01:54 AM

my bad for makin two threads... someone delete one... firefox messed up on me.

Biggie · 07-25-2007, 02:04 AM

Blame Canada

**powerman2000** · 07-25-2007, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NNTB

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

Sweet, now I can go down to Mexico and stock up on some AAS.

All kidding aside, it'll never happen. Too many complications involved.

**DarkFalcon** · 07-25-2007, 05:08 AM

Nothing wrong with that, a unified system would be a powerful equal to the now more powerful EU. It works there and no one gave up their sovereignty. I like the idea.

**Ikaika** · 07-25-2007, 06:14 AM

I dunno, Euros have a different mindset than Americans...I don't think it would fly here to have Mexicans flooding across the border. Imagine what Billy Bob in Kentucky will think of that.

ps. Powerman: no AAS unless the wifey gets edumacated.

LukasJ · 07-25-2007, 05:39 PM

wayy to many issues. Not gonna happen. Now US + Canada maybe. Free border with Mexico along population lines not happening. The US would be flooded due to job surplus and pay here. The law enforcement issue is huge too. Open border from Mexico would be, and is one the largest security risks mainly due to poor immigration and enforcement by the mexicans. For this to happen even democrats controlled MAJOR economic and political changes would have to be in place. Canada would just be more official as the level of cooperation is high, as well as there economic standing and political structure. To say they are almost a 51st state is possible do to our intertwined societies. I mean I know that every politician is corrupt but Mexico is very very bad. Don't get me started on bribery at law enforcement level.

LukasJ · 07-25-2007, 05:54 PM

Some reasons the European Union works. WWII reconstruction intertwined much of the industries. They're close proximity and small country size vs say russia and the US. There need economically since France by itself could not take on the US or Japan. Combined economically they do and actually exceed US GDP. They also have for most part economic equality as kinda Spain is equal to France. Kinda like Canada = US in technological sense. Same cell tech, computer level, reading level. You can view the eastern europe as up and coming and kinda like being our backwoods Alabama. Some cities are advanced and many places are undeveloped inbreeders. Using out houses and such. The only big difference is Eastern Europe is cooler due to AAS and porn. I don't want to see billybob missing teeth doin' his sister.

**Ikaika** · 07-25-2007, 06:17 PM

Did you just say cell tech?

**NNTB** · 07-25-2007, 06:39 PM

**DarkFalcon** · 07-25-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukasJ

Some reasons the European Union works. WWII reconstruction intertwined much of the industries. They're close proximity and small country size vs say russia and the US. There need economically since France by itself could not take on the US or Japan. Combined economically they do and actually exceed US GDP. They also have for most part economic equality as kinda Spain is equal to France. Kinda like Canada = US in technological sense. Same cell tech, computer level, reading level. You can view the eastern europe as up and coming and kinda like being our backwoods Alabama. Some cities are advanced and many places are undeveloped inbreeders. Using out houses and such. The only big difference is Eastern Europe is cooler due to AAS and porn. I don't want to see billybob missing teeth doin' his sister.

lol..some solid points you bring up bro.

**NNTB** · 07-25-2007, 09:00 PM

**romanaz** · 07-27-2007, 02:31 AM

times, they are a changing, and there ain't shit you can do to stop it.

Sam Arias · 07-27-2007, 03:45 AM

Sure, and what about our Central American brothers? Did Bush fail geography, or are they now being relegated to South America?

**DarkFalcon** · 07-27-2007, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Arias

Sure, and what about our Central American brothers? Did Bush fail geography, or are they now being relegated to South America?

They don't have anything the US want's. They like Mexico for it's cheap labor and Canada for it's vast resources. The rest are more problem then value.

**Ikaika** · 07-27-2007, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkFalcon

They don't have anything the US wants.

07-25-2007, 01:52 AM	#1
NNTB rEVOLutionary Join Date: May 2005 Location: FL Posts: 2,446 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 161	How many of you know about this yet? .... do you care? You should... North American Union to Replace the USA? - HUMAN EVENTS President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy. Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed. The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union: At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts. What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005: In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized. To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past. The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated: The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America. Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox. Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him? ---------------------------- The AMERO American currency union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia AmeroCurrency.com portal page Welcome to a discussion of the Amero, the possible new North American currency, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and the formation of a North American Union between the U.S., Canada and MexicoHome The Amero vs. The Dollar ------------------------ Cliff notes: President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy. New Currency could be on the way... the amero. __________________ "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." Abraham Lincoln

07-25-2007, 01:54 AM	#2
NNTB rEVOLutionary Join Date: May 2005 Location: FL Posts: 2,446 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 161	Re: How many of you know about this yet? my bad for makin two threads... someone delete one... firefox messed up on me. __________________ "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." Abraham Lincoln

07-25-2007, 02:04 AM	#3
Biggie Pro Stature Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 838 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 128	Re: How many of you know about this yet? Blame Canada __________________

07-25-2007, 05:08 AM	#5
DarkFalcon I've got a RAGING clue! Join Date: May 2005 Location: dnyc99's cleaning staff Posts: 11,511 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 299	Re: How many of you know about this yet? Nothing wrong with that, a unified system would be a powerful equal to the now more powerful EU. It works there and no one gave up their sovereignty. I like the idea.

07-25-2007, 06:14 AM	#6
Ikaika resident degen Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 3,772 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 216	Re: How many of you know about this yet? I dunno, Euros have a different mindset than Americans...I don't think it would fly here to have Mexicans flooding across the border. Imagine what Billy Bob in Kentucky will think of that. ps. Powerman: no AAS unless the wifey gets edumacated. __________________ No supplement can make up for the lack of a strong work ethic.

07-25-2007, 05:39 PM	#7
LukasJ Pro Stature Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 117 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 7	Re: How many of you know about this yet? wayy to many issues. Not gonna happen. Now US + Canada maybe. Free border with Mexico along population lines not happening. The US would be flooded due to job surplus and pay here. The law enforcement issue is huge too. Open border from Mexico would be, and is one the largest security risks mainly due to poor immigration and enforcement by the mexicans. For this to happen even democrats controlled MAJOR economic and political changes would have to be in place. Canada would just be more official as the level of cooperation is high, as well as there economic standing and political structure. To say they are almost a 51st state is possible do to our intertwined societies. I mean I know that every politician is corrupt but Mexico is very very bad. Don't get me started on bribery at law enforcement level. __________________ Slip out the back before they know you were there And at the worst you'll see nobody cares Cos you dont wana be around when it all goes down Even heroes know when to be scared ...Fort Minor - Slip out the back

07-25-2007, 05:54 PM	#8
LukasJ Pro Stature Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 117 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 7	Re: How many of you know about this yet? Some reasons the European Union works. WWII reconstruction intertwined much of the industries. They're close proximity and small country size vs say russia and the US. There need economically since France by itself could not take on the US or Japan. Combined economically they do and actually exceed US GDP. They also have for most part economic equality as kinda Spain is equal to France. Kinda like Canada = US in technological sense. Same cell tech, computer level, reading level. You can view the eastern europe as up and coming and kinda like being our backwoods Alabama. Some cities are advanced and many places are undeveloped inbreeders. Using out houses and such. The only big difference is Eastern Europe is cooler due to AAS and porn. I don't want to see billybob missing teeth doin' his sister. __________________ Slip out the back before they know you were there And at the worst you'll see nobody cares Cos you dont wana be around when it all goes down Even heroes know when to be scared ...Fort Minor - Slip out the back

07-25-2007, 06:17 PM	#9
Ikaika resident degen Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 3,772 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 216	Re: How many of you know about this yet? Did you just say cell tech? __________________ No supplement can make up for the lack of a strong work ethic.

07-25-2007, 06:39 PM	#10
NNTB rEVOLutionary Join Date: May 2005 Location: FL Posts: 2,446 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 161	Re: How many of you know about this yet? lol __________________ "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." Abraham Lincoln

07-25-2007, 09:00 PM	#12
NNTB rEVOLutionary Join Date: May 2005 Location: FL Posts: 2,446 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 161	Re: How many of you know about this yet? __________________ "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it." Abraham Lincoln

07-27-2007, 03:45 AM	#14
Sam Arias Pro Stature Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 109 Recipes: 0 Rep Power: 12	Re: How many of you know about this yet? Sure, and what about our Central American brothers? Did Bush fail geography, or are they now being relegated to South America?